68-3

14/130

210response inhibition was significant. Whereas the correlation between brain activity and SSRT was also significant, the correlation between the centrality and SSRT was not significant in the parcel. These results suggest that the ventral part of right vIFC is involved in stopping behavior and plays a critical role in the brain network for response inhibition.AcknowledgmentsNot applicable.This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K07807 to A.O. and 18K07348 to T.O. and a grant from Takeda Science Foundation to S.K.Author ContributionsUF, AO, and SK designed research. AO, TO, MT, AS, NH, KK, and SA performed research. UF, AO, SK, and TO summarized data and wrote the paper.Figure 2　Relations among behavior, task activation, and network centrality. A. Target parcel ROIs in the IFC. B. Correlation between the centrality indices and the brain activity (Stop success minus Go success) in ROI 1. They are significantly correlated (r = 0.62, p = 0.003). C. Correlation between centrality indices and brain activity in ROI 2. They are not significantly correlated (r = -0.01, p = 0.97). D. Correlation between brain activity and SSRT in ROI 1. They are significantly correlated (r = -0.50, p = 0.026). Modified from Fujimoto et al.6). 1) Aron AR, Fletcher PC, Bullmore ET, Sahakian BJ, Robbins, TW: Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci, 2003; 6: 115-116. 2) Verbruggen F, Aron AR, Stevens MA, Chambers CD: Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2010; 107: 13966-13971. 3) Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC et al: A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature, 2016; 536: 171-178. 4) Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW et al: Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains. Neuron, 2017; 95: 791-807.e7. 5) Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Adeyemo B, Huckins JF, Kelley WM, Petersen SE: Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correla-tions. Cereb Cortex, 2017; 26: 288-303. 6) Fujimoto U, Ogawa A, Osada T, et al: Network centrality reveals dissociable brain activity during response inhi-bition in human right ventral part of inferior frontal cortex. Neurosci, 2020; 433:163-173. 7) Osada T, Ohta S, Ogawa A et al: An essential role of the intraparietal sulcus in response inhibition predicted The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.FundingConflicts of interest statementReferences