68-1

60/98

1) Suzuki K, Koike T, Asakawa T, et al: A prospective radiological study of thin-section computed tomog-raphy to predict pathological noninvasiveness in peripheral clinical IA lung cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201). J Thorac Oncol, 2011; 6: 751-6. 2) Burt BM, Leung AN, Yanagawa M, et al: Diameter of Solid Tumor Component Alone Should be Used to Establish T Stage in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22 Suppl, 2015; 3: S1318-23. 3) Hwang EJ, Park CM, Ryu Y, et al: Pulmonary adeno-carcinomas appearing as part-solid ground-glass nodules: is measuring solid component size a better prognostic indicator? Eur Radiol, 2015; 25: 558-67. 4) Maeyashiki T, Suzuki K, Hattori A, et al: The size of consolidation on thin-section computed tomography is a better predictor of survival than the maximum tumour dimension in resectable lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012; 43: 915-8. 5) Suzuki K, Asamura H, Kusumoto M, et al: “Early” peripheral lung cancer: prognostic significance of ground glass opacity on thin-section computed tomographic scan. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002; 74: 1635-9. 6) Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Mimae T, et al: The prognostic role of pathologic invasive component size, excluding lepidic growth, in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013; 146: 580-5. 7) Travis WD, Asamura H, Bankier AA, et al: The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2016; 11: 1204-23. 8) Fukui M, Takamochi K, Ouchi T, et al: Evaluation of solid portions in non-small cell lung cancer-the solid part is not always measurable for clinical T factor. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2021; 51: 114-119. 9) Matsunaga T, Suzuki K, Hattori A, et al: Lung cancer with scattered consolidation: detection of new indepen-dent radiological category of peripheral lung cancer on thin-section computed tomography. Interact Cardio-vasc Thorac Surg, 2012; 16: 445-9. 10) Hattori A, Hirayama S, Matsunaga T, et al: Distinct Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis Based on the Presence of Ground Glass Opacity Component in Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol, 2019; 14: 265-275. 11) Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, et al: Neither Maximum Tumor Size nor Solid Component Size Is Prognostic in Part-Solid Lung Cancer: Impact of 58Tumor Size Should Be Applied Exclusively to Solid Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016; 102: 407-15. 12) Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, et al: Prog-nostic impact of a ground glass opacity component in the clinical T classification of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017. 13) Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, et al: Impor-tance of Ground Glass Opacity Component in Clinical Stage IA Radiologic Invasive Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017; 104: 313-320. 14) Hattori A, Suzuki K, Matsunaga T, et al: Is limited resection appropriate for radiologically “solid” tumors in small lung cancers? Ann Thorac Surg, 2012; 94: 212-5. 15) Hattori A, Suzuki K, Takamochi K, et al: Prognostic impact of a ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardio-vasc Surg, 2021; 161: 1469-1480. 16) Suzuki K, Kusumoto M, Watanabe S, et al: Radiologic classification of small adenocarcinoma of the lung: radiologic-pathologic correlation and its prognostic impact. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006; 81: 413-9. 17) Watanabe Y, Hattori A, Nojiri S, et al: Clinical impact of a small component of ground-glass opacity in solid- dominant clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020. 18) Aokage K, Miyoshi T, Ishii G, et al: Clinical and Patho-logical Staging Validation in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer: Correlation between Solid Size on Thin-Section Computed Tomog-raphy and Invasive Size in Pathological Findings in the New T Classification. J Thorac Oncol, 2017; 12: 1403-1412. 19) Saji H, Matsubayashi J, Akata S, et al: Correlation between whole tumor size and solid component size on high-resolution computed tomography in the predic-tion of the degree of pathologic malignancy and the prognostic outcome in primary lung adenocarcinoma. Acta Radiol, 2015; 56: 1187-95. 20) Takamochi K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al: The role of computed tomographic scanning in diagnosing medias-tinal node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2000; 119: 1135-40. 21) Matsunaga T, Suzuki K, Takamochi K, et al: What is the radiological definition of part-solid tumour in lung cancer?dagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2017; 51: 242-247. 22) Asamura H, Hishida T, Suzuki K, et al: Radiographically determined noninvasive adenocarcinoma of the lung: Survival outcomes of Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013; 146: 24-30. 23) Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Hayashi T, et al: Prognostic Impact of the Findings on Thin-Section Computed Tomography in Patients with Subcentimeter Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2017; 12: 954-962. 24) Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Takamochi K, et al: The onco-logical outcomes of segmentectomy in clinical-T1b lung adenocarcinoma with a solid-dominant appearance on thin-section computed tomography. Surg Today, 2015. 25) Hsu PK, Huang HC, Hsieh CC, et al: Effect of formalin fixation on tumor size determination in stage I non- small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 84: 1825-9. 26) Yamada N, Kusumoto M, Maeshima A, et al: Correla-tion of the solid part on high-resolution computed Author contributionsAH performed the manuscript conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing of the original draft. KS contributed to the manuscript conceptualization, supervision and review & editing of the original graft.Conflicts of interest statementWe have no conflict of interest to disclose.Reference