67-6

33/93

1) Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting onco-logic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatec-tomy. European urology. 2012; 62: 382-404. 2) Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, et al: Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot- assisted versus retropubic. European urology. 2011; 60: 413-9. 3) Hu JC, Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, et al: Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. European urology. 2014; 66: 666-72. 4) Kawachi MH: Counterpoint: robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: perhaps the surgical gold standard for prostate cancer care. Journal of the National Compre-hensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2007; 5: 689-92. 5) Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of chronic diseases. 1987; 40: 373-83. 6) Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, Mucci LA, Stampfer MJ, Kenfield SA: Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. European urology. 2015; 67: 432-8. 7) Lowrance WT, Tarin TV, Shariat SF: Evidence-based comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2010; 10: 2228-37. 8) Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, Chen Z, Xu H, Ye Z: Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 32237-57. 9) Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al: Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical pros-tatectomy. European urology. 2015; 67: 660-70.10) Carter SC, Lipsitz S, Shih YC, Nguyen PL, Trinh QD, Hu JC: Population-based determinants of radical pros-tatectomy operative time. BJU international. 2014; 113: E112-8.11) Lavery HJ, Samadi DB, Thaly R, et al: The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-insti-tutional survey. Journal of robotic surgery. 2009; 3: 165.12) Mazzone E, Dell'Oglio P, Rosiello G, et al: Technical Refinements in Superextended Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. European urology. 2020.13) Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical pros-tatectomy. European urology. 2012; 62: 405-17.14) Kitamura K, China T, Kanayama M, et al: Significant association between urethral length measured by magnetic resonance imaging and urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Prostate international. 2019; 7: 54-9.15) Nguyen LN, Head L, Witiuk K, et al: The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of urology. 2017; 198: 760-9.16) Cameron AP, Suskind AM, Neer C, et al: Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urody-namics and 3T MRI: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 34: 527-32.541Conflicts of interestThe authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.Author contributionsKK, TK, HK and FS were primary urologists for these cases and participated in the patient's opera-tion. SM analyzed and interpreted the patient data. YS and SH supervised the treatment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.References